See the results below.
As you can see high gain and low exposure seem to offer the best image detail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05538/05538fcfc0e2d202c1396db9d81d825b47207de7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa576/aa57625a74f0d6c85b1247500a31a24333df0dc8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfdf8/bfdf831884255735dc3919945f5a3c2c1524f3c2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21e4f/21e4f3a782e0be9e4d8fdf114b7f4fe7e15c200e" alt=""
Not a very scientific test. I took around 1000 frames and processed each in Registax to the same wavelets. With a single 128 align box in the centre of the crater.
Basic rule now - whoop the gain up.